The New Republic on MSNOpinion
How AI Is Reshaping Science’s Most Trusted Tool
Systematic reviews take a long time, but are the gold standard in evaluating evidence and producing medical recommendations.
The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine are private, nonprofit institutions that provide expert advice on some of the most pressing challenges facing the nation and world. Our ...
"I've gotten assistance from the WMU Library with setting up and conducting scoping and systematic reviews. The help with navigating databases and selecting appropriate search terms is top notch." ...
An ad hoc committee of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine will produce a report to update the standards for systematic reviews as defined in the 2011 report Finding What ...
Despite rapid advances in large language models, this study shows that human expertise remains critical for producing rigorous systematic reviews, with AI best suited as a supervised support tool ...
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is launching a “stronger, more systematic” review process for chemicals in food. The US government agency said in a statement, citing US Department of Health ...
Objective To synthesise data on the associations between cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and health in children and adolescents, evaluate the certainty of evidence and identify knowledge gaps. Design ...
Background Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterised by impairments in social ...
Objective To synthesise the evidence on the effects of physical activity on symptoms of depression, anxiety and psychological distress in adult populations. Design Umbrella review. Data sources Twelve ...
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results